Updates from January, 2010 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • jackhardy 19:32 on April 12, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: digital platforms, new media, online content   

    Consumer Appetite for Media Insatiable 

    Just read the recent Arbitron study that revealed the average person spends 1 hour and 21 minutes more each day consuming media than in 2001. This increase over the last ten years means that literally every spare minute of your time (is there really such a thing as spare time anymore?) is spent consuming content from the Internet, radio, television–literally absorbing new content. The reason is because of the proliferation of digital devices, namely smartphones, that enable 24/7 access to information that we are consuming during the time we normally take public transportation, wait in lines or offices. Smartphones, social media and online radio are the enablers of this behavior. It’s good news for content developers since it appears there is an ever increasing audience and appetite for all things digital. I only have one question: when was the last time you had a conversation with the person next to you at the grocery store, waiting room or bus stop?

     
    • Quanah P. Polichetto 15:51 on January 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      What is this concept you talk of called “spare time”? You are right! I know every chance I get I am on my cell phone checking email, Facebook, or texting friends. I am so addicted that I do the dangerous thing of doing so while driving… I have read many articles about people dying because they texted while driving. Myth Busters actually did an episode where they showed that talking on your cell phone, even on a hands free device, is just as dangerous if not more dangerous than drunk driving. Also in March of 2010 AT&T release a video that discourages attempts to discourage texting and driving. This is a serious problem! I have decided that I need to get serious about the dangers of texting while driving. It is a threat to everyone’s lives while on the road.
      Here’s the website to the AT & T video: http://youtu.be/DebhWD6ljZs
      One has to ask themselves the question: do I really want my last word(s) to be a text?
      It’s not worth it. A text is not worth my life or anyone elses. I do admit I have a problem. Even after all this knowledge on the subject, I still text while driving.
      I do still have conversations with that person next to me at the grocery store, waiting room or bus stop, but not nearly as much as I did as teen when I did not even own a cell phone. Technology is a wonderful thing, but like anything else excess can become a real problem. I need help! I don’t even think I could go 24 hours without my phone…

    • Michaela Specht 23:08 on January 26, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I saw a few episodes of Portlandia recently (television show starring Fred Armisen) in which they poke fun at Portlanders for being consumed in this technology loop and then again in another episode they make fun at how the possible loss of a phone would trigger a state of depression in a person. They claim that it’s an obvious exaggeration, but the fact is that the sketches are influenced by things that they actually witness. I for one, have forgotten my phone several times and have gone days without checking Facebook or watching television, and I’ve been fine, but that’s probably because of the fact that I just don’t have a lot of time to enjoy media. I get frustrated when someone says, I’m “anti-social” or ignoring them because I don’t ever respond on Facebook or take too long to respond to a text, when the truth is I still prefer normal conversation like a phone call or a chat over coffee.

    • Michaela Specht 23:26 on January 26, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Here are some links to what I was talking about:
      http://youtu.be/7jT0JT3N47g

      http://youtu.be/NPL7Snp38rA

    • Pouria Tehran 03:01 on February 3, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      The increase in the internet usage shows the demand for information, however, addiction to such a trait is unfortunate. Internet, TV, and phone are meant to improve lifestyle and information search quality, and the fact that not having an access to it could be held accountable for depression would be a frustrating factor. I have personally and unintentionally been dragged into the high usage of internet which lack of access to internet, by phone or computer, would make me anxious. I believe this was not the original intention of technology, but such a high demand should be taken under control by considering technology, specifically internet, a product that improper usage of it could result in undesired outcomes.

    • Jieyi Peng 08:49 on February 18, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      This discussion really makes me think how Media has impacted my life. First, I have to say media like internet, smart phones have brought lots of convenience to my life. For example, I can access the information that I want easily, and especially I am studying abroad now, internet and some web messengers provide more convenient ways for me to chat with my families or friends in my home country. On the other hand, I notice that since I have Smartphone, I have spent more time on media than before because Smartphone allows me to get the access more easily. Most of the times that I need to wait in line or bus stops, I usually surf the web, check my emails, or check on some social media sites through my Smartphone. Because sometimes I see people around me are doing the same things or sometimes we don’t know how to start a conversation, I just feel like these things could help me kill some waiting time. However, for communication way, although we have more ways to chat with to people now, I still prefer face-to-face communication rather than texting or emailing because I feel like face-to-face communication can cause less miscommunication.

    • Ashley L. Folsom 05:39 on February 19, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I think when a person is by themselves…access to a phone is like a security blanket. If they would be otherwise in an uncomfortable situation, a smartphone can help people forget about their worries. I do however think it creates a more inhuman interaction, but it makes us cherish old forms of media like personal letters or cards.

      I think people have been predicting more technological advancements= more technological communication for years… Look at the Jetsons, or Terminator movies which have been around forever. It’s a give/ pull society…we go from one fad to the next..but just like 80′s trends and Atari games get brought back into current culture, so do concepts we miss… Like old fashion communication. Give it a few years… I bet someone will invent or re-market an old trend that will bring back old school communication lines. Then again,who can truly predict the future?

  • jackhardy 21:19 on May 14, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: adobe, , flash, HTML5, W3   

    When Your Ad Campaign Makes News 

    The Wall St. Journal technology blog, “digit,” posted commentary yesterday about the ongoing feud between Adobe’s Flash product and Apple. (http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/05/13/from-adobe-to-apple-with-love-not-really/?mod=rss_WSJBlog&mod=) This is an instance of companies competing over technology standards, prompted by new product capabilities (in this case, the proprietary Apple software running iPhones and iPads) and the ever evolving Internet. What’s interesting about this debate is the tactic that Adobe has used to draw attention–an advertising campaign. This is not unique in and of itself, however, the company has put itself front and center in the spotlight and resulted in a more public “back and forth” from the PR teams at the two companies. Yesterday’s blog post was updated today with a comment from the Apple PR spokesperson who confirmed the company is a supporter of open Web standards, unlike the Adobe Flash product. It seems Apple is correct, according to the W3 consortium that sets web standards. The consortium has officially endorsed HTML5 as an open web standard, which may eliminate the need for the Adobe Flash product. So, it’s a war of words, if you will.

     
    • Steve Knight 03:28 on May 25, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      The key phrase in this whole debate is this: EVER EVOLVING Internet. That sums up what the latest issue is and what the compatibility issues are for Apple products using Adobe software. The article is clear to say that the issues are not just Apple issues, they are issues in the PC/Microsoft world as well. From a public relations perspective, this probably isn’t the best of timing for Apple to be taking the stance they are. It seems that they have had some other PR challenges lately that have made them appear a little bit on the “do what we say” side of communication. This never fairs well in a somewhat free society we live in.

      • Anthony Kinen 01:56 on May 31, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I agree with the “do what we say” side of communication. Apple has always been that way. I remember seeing an interview about Apples product development, featuring none other Stave Jobs. In this interview Jobs made a disturbing statement. He said “the consumer does not know what they want, it is our job to tell them what they want.” At first I thought this was a fairly egotistical statement, but the more I thought I realized he was right. I know how computers work to a great extent, but there are many products and services under development that are useful, but still something that I never thought of. This is just an explanation of why Apple may be communicating in such a way. While this is their usual style of communication, I think they have gone a little too far this time. Before Apple was a smaller company that did not have the “power” they have now. It will be interesting to see how it all plays out.

        • Meg Van Winkle 03:19 on June 2, 2010 Permalink

          I agree. These issues are basically everywhere in the computing world, and will be for a long time. I feel like Apple did a good job in defending itself.

          As for Steve Jobs’ comment on them having to tell us what we as consumers want…isn’t that how marketing works? A product or service is offered and it’s up to the marketers to make the consumer believe that they want or need it. As for the computer, yes I do need it because I need to be able to work on homework when I’m not at school.

      • Philip Peterson 18:45 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I agree Steve! The internet in always evolving and always will be. People need to realize this fact and come to terms with it. Steve Jobs is a smart man and there are good reasons behind why he makes the decisions he does. Apple has done a good job at coming to a conclusion and sticking to it. Consumers may not realize these facts but will over time.

    • Nejla Tajipour 22:25 on May 27, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Consumers don’t want Flash – they want the content it displays. Another medium with similar content would be fine as long as people get their video & game fix. Which is why JavaScript, HTML5, etc. will do fine. As for the lack of Flash bringing down Apple as some have ludicrously suggested, the iPhone & iPod Touch have never had Flash, and they’re both doing pretty well the last time I checked. So if you want Flash, don’t buy an iPhone, iPad or iPod Touch. No one’s forcing you. Just as Apple is free to build their machines the way they want, and Adobe is free to develop Flash the way it wants.

      • Rasy Sar 01:20 on May 31, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        Although I agree with you, Adobe is freaking out because if people are beginning to have the same mindset – Flash will be a thing of the past and that means a lack of profits for them. Aside from Photoshop and Reader, I don’t know what else Adobe has going for them? The saying, “out with the old and in with the new” definitely reminds me of what’s going on here. I’m sure Adobe knows very well that technology is rapidly evolving, they just need to come up with something new and revolutionizing.

      • Bobby McClintock 03:28 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I agree if you are looking for flash you shouldn’t bye apple, buy something else. I do however find it pretty interesting to read that flash might not even be needed after the development of HTML5.

      • Yousef 22:00 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        Exactly most users don’t really give attention to what type of app that is causing this file to work. The limitation by Adobe is a right for the company to build a long term strategy for its existence. Technology nowadays feels like it develop it self day by day. The concept of a flash player sooner or later might no longer exist and it is the right of the company to save it business level strategy.

      • James Over 07:18 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I agree, Apple has done fine and is doing fine without conforming to the majority of the market out there. For years they have come out with cutting edge technology that can only make the competitors jealous of the aesthetics and ease with in which they run. Just like the commercials, there are Mac people and PC people, I am a Mac person myself and I for see them taking over the world some day.

    • Anthony Kinen 01:46 on May 31, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I remember learning how to add Flash content to web pages in high school. At the time is was a fairly new technology. However that was several years ago. The internet technology is changing at a very fast rate. Depending on who you talk to Flash is obsolete. It is time to move on to bigger and better things. Users are expecting more and more from their internet and computer experience. Apple realizes this and does what is necessary to stay in tune with the market. Apple has not said that it will not support any of Adobe products, it is just the belief of Apple that it is time for Adobe to move on.

      • Kimberly Lawson 18:39 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I agree that technology is an ever-changing thing and we tend to blow right past new technology to something even better. I’ll admit that it really bums me out when I go to some website on my Iphone and can’t get to a section because it’s using flash, but other than that I’m perfectly fine with my Apple products and definitely enjoying my phone/online experience.

        • James Over 07:43 on June 2, 2010 Permalink

          It can be annoying when a website uses flash, I too have had to get use to not being able to use flash on my Mac, but it wouldn’t make me not buy another one. I just think that there should be something compatible to everybody’s hard wear no matter Mac or PC. There should be a general standard when it comes to the internet, that way everybody can do what they need to do and not be prohibited due to some compatibility issue.

    • Yousef 03:24 on May 31, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I have found an article that presents the issue from Apple point of view clearly, where the New York Post reports that the U.S. Department of Justice is talking to industry figures about Apple’s decision not to support Adobe Flash on the iPad.
      for more info:
      http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/apple_probe_grows_eC2Xojek2kBNijBO2uP1kJ

    • Marlon Harris 08:33 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I agree that Apple is responsible and in charge of what features or apps, etc. they’ll have on their iphone, ipad and such. If adobe can’t get Apple to take on their business then they should simple build their own as they’ve done and add their Flash component to it. Apple has done just fine without it and can choose whatever feature that fancies them.

    • Royal Bryant 05:00 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Adobe cant get mad at apple for not using them to run internent software. I cant remember who said it but somewhere up there I saw the words “EVER EVOLVING” internet. This is a true statement. Apple is know for creating and manufacturing their own platforms and in no way is this debacle a reason for Adobe to be mad.

    • Christian Aniciete 06:52 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      As a user of Apple’s iPhone and iTouch, it can certainly be frustrating when I stumble upon websites that require Flash. While I understand Apple’s decision not to support this feature, I am confident that the company soon enough will develop a form of technology that will address this problem. Without a doubt, just reflecting on its numerous inventions and the way Apple has revolutionized the technological world in the past decade, I look forward to seeing what Apple will come up with next.

    • Sammy Al-B 07:51 on March 11, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      I agree with some of the commenters, in that this back and fourth about Flash is an ever evolving issue, but at any point in an argument, all you can do is state facts. Many times Apple has asked adobe to produce a version of flash that does consume an enormous amount of battery life, to which they have not been able to do so…

      Furthermore, many android phones that promised to play flash, have only a beta version installed on the phone, and from numerous reviews on such phones, and reports, the battery life when viewing flash content is just abysmal. Flash is an excellent standard, just not in terms of battery life.

  • jackhardy 22:47 on May 4, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , quit, social media   

    Facebook Dilemma 

    Read a post today that was highly critical of Facebook. Well, to be more accurate, it actually recommended deleting your Facebook account and provided the top ten reasons why this made sense. First, read the article here: http://www.rocket.ly/home/2010/4/26/top-ten-reasons-you-should-quit-facebook.html and then post your own thoughts about it. Is this just a rant of an unfriendly blogger or a well-thought out post by a disgruntled customer. Or, is it perhaps a thinly disguised attack piece by an employee of a competitor? The main question you need to answer is this: Should the company ignore it or respond?

     
    • Rasy 23:13 on May 4, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Funny thing is, my brother posted something similar to this on..well, his Facebook. I understand the reasoning behind this article but people are so dependent on Facebook for social interaction that it’s hard to quit. Right now, I’m in a computer lab with at least half of the users on Facebook interspersing with studying and doing homework. I wouldn’t be surprised if Facebook doesn’t respond to this as this article is from a blog (?)…but if it were published by a news outlet like on NBC then they would (which they have responded to).

      Nice opinion piece though.

    • Emma 07:38 on May 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      An interesting opinion piece of what seems like another advertising ploy to have readers join one of his selective “you can too” social media sites. He makes it so easy for you and even discreetly presents you with the name of HIS business. (Funny how he conveniently works for a social media group.) I especially enjoyed the part where he states that the CEO’s unethical behavior is a good reason to leave a site, derived from what sources?

    • jackhardy 15:32 on May 6, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Here’s another update to the Facebook story: it’s an excerpt from the soon-to-be-released book about Facebook beginnings and founder Mark Zuckerberg. He comes across as juvenile and condescending. Read more here: http://www.observer.com/2010/daily-transom/facebooks-embarassing-youth-1.

    • Yousef Alomran 10:00 on May 9, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      The article is interesting to bring attention to the unethical actions of Facebook’s CEO Zuckerberg. However, when looking at the 10 reasons; I feel that you can combined some of the reasons, since the author had braked them to more than one reason. For example, reasons 10. Facebook’s Terms Of Service are completely one-sided, 5. Even your private data is shared with applications. Reason 10 is a result of 5 and is actually not a different reason for not using Facebook.

    • Philip Peterson 18:28 on May 11, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Like many stated above I found the article to be very interesting. I agree with parts of this article and other parts I disagree. First I agree that the process of deleting an account is ridiculously complicated. I feel that Facebook does take advantage of there customers by never allowing them to fully delete their personal profile if they wish. I really feel that the rest of the article was a bit over board. Yes, Facebook should be more open about new policy’s such as setting the default to social and this would make them more credible but really it’s the users responsibility. People must understand that anything you decide to post on the World Wide Web is open to the world. One should take responsibility for what they decide to put on Facebook. Is Facebook taking advantage of peoples privacy I would say yes but be responsible for your actions and there shouldn’t be any problems.

      • Emma 07:51 on May 12, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I definitely agree with your statement about being responsible for one’s own actions, especially when the entire World has access to it. Whether it happens to be stated in the agreed upon “terms and conditions” or not, it is a given that hitting a “privacy” button does not actually make it private. Facebook is a basic communication tool. It’s unfortunate that people have expectations that it is more than it actually is, then the company pays for it and so do its other satisfied customers.

    • Stephen Knight 21:14 on May 11, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      By no means should Facebook respond to this criticism, it would be a waste of their time. Honestly, how many people read the terms of service on anything these days? Everytime there is an update for my ipod or itunes I required to aknowledge the fact that I have read them. I have never read them and it is fair to say I am not alone on this. The author of the article has stated his opinions and concerns, but couldn’t this be done with hundreds of other websites out there as well?

    • Julie Nguyen 20:56 on May 14, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      It is interesting how Facebook has an article like this. I believe the majority of the people in this world has a Facebook and they have the freedom to put any information they would like to share to the world or to their friends and families. Although, they also have the choice to set their account as public or private. I also agreed to Stephen, no one read the terms of service when they prompt to read and agree to. Most people check agree and have their account set up and ready to use. However, it is everyone’s responsiblity to understand the condition of service, if its not important why would it be there in the first place?

    • Royal B 20:58 on May 17, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I think that this is an interesting article. There were many facts that the author pointed out that I never knew about and concerned me a little bit. Although he had some good information I kept noticing that he would refer to “other” social media sites with a link that you could click on that would send you there. I do not know if he has any other motives other than being concerned for people, but I have a feeling he does have some sort of stake in the social networking field. At the end of the day I will keep my facebook and hopefully it doesnt come back to bite me in the future.

      • Emma Tudorache 04:27 on May 18, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I agree with you Royal. I think he may have a stake in posting this outside of what seems like just plain concern for people’s privacy. The post is definitely one that Facebook’s PR should address to give its users peace of mind, but from a Facebook user’s perspective, it’s not one that was convincing enough for me to stop my account. It did however, make me wonder if some of those “facts” were real. Maybe that’s what it was intended to do.

    • Christian Aniciete 07:25 on May 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Like many others have already said, this article surely raises a lot of compelling points about the use of Facebook. As a self-proclaimed “social media aficionado” (I am a marketing/advertising management senior!), I consider myself to be a heavy Facebook user. Truly, I won’t ever claim it’s perfect because I’ve got my share of complaints about it, but for its sole purpose in connecting family and friends around the world, Facebook does an incredible job. Surely, it is far better than anything that’s come before it like Myspace.

      I do agree that Facebook as a company should take the opportunity to at least read this article and take it as constructive feedback for ways to improve. Otherwise, I have a strong feeling that the author just simply has a personal distaste with Facebook and seems to really have no use for it. For his number 1 reason, the author stated: “Between the farms and the mafia wars and the “top news” (which always guesses wrong – is that configurable somehow?) and the myriad privacy settings and the annoying ads (with all that data about me, the best they can apparently do is promote dating sites, because, uh, I’m single) and the thousands upon thousands of crappy applications…” This reasoning just doesn’t do it for me. This is a reality – whether good or bad – with what Facebook features and offers to its users. Don’t like them? You don’t have to be a part of it. You always have a choice.

      I am a firm believer, like what a few have also already noted above, that ultimately, the user should take ownership of their actions online on social networking websites like Facebook. The system is not perfect but users can at least do their part in protecting their selves by limiting the amount of personal information disclosed online.

    • Kimberly Lawson 17:42 on May 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      This just seemed like an angry rant that brought up some weaknesses facebook has but I don’t think facebook should even
      think about responding to this. Facebook seems to be one of those things that a large amount of people are going to utilize and therefore to stay in touch with this large group you must stick with facebook too. The main points I retained from this is basically privacy issues, and an egotistical immature owner but the thing is I don’t really expect much more from facebook. I believe that common knowledge of the internet should be enough for people to know not to post private information on the web.

      • Bobby McClintock 17:20 on May 25, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I agree that most people are aware that they shouldn’t post private information on the web, but I disagree that facebook shouldn’t respond. I think they would have to respond in some way, because they don’t want to turn into a wal-mart situation. Plus they are tech people so they know that the post is out there, why not respond to it. It can only help your cause if you can disprove anything this blogger has said.

        • Kimberly Lawson 18:43 on June 1, 2010 Permalink

          I really don’t think that this Facebook blog post is so negative that it’s like the Wal-Mart situation. I think they did a great job of sending out the little message to everyone’s facebook about privacy settings instead of coming up with some thing responding directly to the blog.

    • Nejla 03:27 on May 20, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I happen to be someone who likes Facebook. If you use the privacy controls and groups that Facebook offers, then you shouldn’t have a problem. Of course, with technology, nothing is absolutely protected. Facebook does allow you to customize settings down to which of your friends can see your status updates, pictures, etc. The problem is that people are not savy enough to use the tools available. But in the end, people should take responsibilty for what they post. I use facebook and love it for the fact that I got to reconnect with friends I lost touch with. It’s a great way for me to keep in touch with my large family that is spread all over the country and even some overseas. There’s nothing wrong with social networking sites or communicating through them, and if you don’t don’t want others to know or see something about you, then DON”T POST IT!

    • Bailey Ortiz 00:08 on May 27, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      This article intrigued me and many people actually have posted this on their faceboook to let others know what is going on. If you are smart on facebook and dont give out too much information then privacy issues shouldnt cause tooo much havoc. The one thing I do agree with in this article is that deleting your facebook is a huge process you cant just click the deactivate button like it shows. Even when you delete you facebook and want to reactivate it you will still receive updates and it will still have all your old posts and pics available.

    • Anthony Kinen 00:34 on May 31, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I am conflicted on where to stand on this issue. I believe that ones self is solely responsible for keeping their private information private. Posting anything on the internet is opening the door for the world to see. Every company, product, or service is going to have some sort of weakness. Facebook is no exception , but I do not see it asa a reason to delete ones account. If one operates with caution and does not put privlaged information onto thier Facebook account there is no reason for concern.

    • Marlon Harris 20:32 on May 31, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I agree with many of the comments above that if one is concerned with protecting their private information than they should take the necessary steps to do that by not posting information that could damage their name and person. Unfortunately, in this day and age it’s hard to keep identity thieves from getting a hold of our most private information. The internet has become a place to do so many things, but Facebook and all other social outlets are not tamper proof and we should all be aware of that. If Facebook is concerned with their customer’s safety they will take big strides to try and protect our private information. I surely hope so!!

    • Emma Tudorache 00:36 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I recently had a Facebook friend send me a message to be careful on what information and pictures I post on my page. Apparently, there’s an electronic “book” that is being sold to companies which contains user information and pictures, which I guess they are able to use for different purposes. Maybe they’re using some of our pictures for clipart throughout their business publications (I find that funny)! I’m not sure that this is true (it seems a little hard to believe), but it definitely makes me more aware that anyone has access to it.

      Has anyone heard of this?

      • Bobby McClintock 05:03 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I haven’t heard of this. If this is true it makes me pretty nervous about having a facebook. I block almost everything from everyone just for the reason of privacy. But if I’m blocking it from my peers and the information is still available to the this “electronic book” that makes me want to follow this bloggers advice and delete my facebook haha.

        • Emma Tudorache 09:01 on June 1, 2010 Permalink

          (If this “book” was to be true…) Privacy from others who I don’t want to view my page seems easy, but how would I as a user go about maintaining my privacy and keep it away from the “black market” of information being sold to other companies to use?! And would Facebook really tell its users if there was such as one?

      • Christian Aniciete 06:59 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I have never heard of that but it sure is scary and unsettling to know that such applications like that exist on Facebook. I think what is even more troubling is how deceptive these “fun” and “user-friendly” applications can be. This definitely calls for a more cautious approach to using Facebook nowadays.

    • Marlon Harris 08:39 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Whenever I hear about these stories of privacy and how almost anyone can still get a hold of your information through Facebook, I makes me wonder what good is their privacy feature? If we choose to only have our friends and family look at this stuff and others are able to get through our so-called privacy blocks, it just doesn’t make much sense to me. Privacy!! I don’t think so!

    • Nejla Tajipour 22:27 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      If anyone is foolish enough to upload info that is of such a personal nature that it can be used against you to social networking sites then they probably deserve to be targeted. Privacy is not what it used to be but it still remains people’s own choice as to what they upload in terms of pictures and info. If something is sensitive and potentially damaging, don’t be ignorant enough to put it on the internet!

      • James Over 06:43 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I agree, I look at some peoples Facebook and the pictures and information they have are both excessive and somewhat ridiculous. Users have to draw a line at some point as to what pictures and information they post, a lot of people are out there reading this stuff. I for one refuse to put anything more then my email address on there, let alone incriminating pictures that could affect a career opportunity.

    • Rasy Sar 01:21 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Seeing how Zuckerberg has addressed this privacy issue and implemented the new settings, I still don’t think that many people were concerned about getting rid of their Facebook in the first place. There was an article on CNN (http://tinyurl.com/2cfnjju) that was about “Quitting Facebook Day” – which occurred yesterday. The results? 64% of readers said that they were not going to quit the social networking site despite this event. Even after the whole “privacy settings control” controversy – users aren’t really phased by whether or not personal information about themselves could be leaked.

    • Meg Van Winkle 02:55 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      There are plenty of reasons to have a Facebook account, the main one for me is to keep in touch and updated on my family and friends. The reasons stated in the opinion piece not to have a Facebook are legitimate, but I really don’t think that it’s enough to make me delete my account. I’m just glad that the article and others like it have gotten enough media attention that Facebook did end up changing its privacy policy.

    • scott bonallo 04:11 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I’m probably the only person in this class that doesn’t and have never had a Facebook page. I have been hounded persistently by friends to join the online sensation but have thus far resisted their requests. Whether or not the blogger was mean-spirited or a competitor doesn’t change the message. He brought up many good points that I have seen first-hand through my friends’ experiences with the site. Because many people use the page as a top medium for communication, they tend to socialize in person a lot less which I find particularly disturbing because friendships are about experiences. My friends experience a lot less in life by sitting around on computers talking about their lives. My friends have also run into trouble with employers for pictures they have posted so the pages are easily accessed by anyone that wants to dig up dirt on you. I see the pages as a huge liability if “misused” in this way. The sad part about these pages is the immense social pressure put on people who choose not to have a page in the form of feeling out of touch and disconnected with people you have known your whole life. It feels as if one either needs to conform or risk being ignored.

    • James Over 06:40 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Being that this post is old and I am just now responding to it, I know the outcome, and yes Facebook did respond to this blog. By making changes to the social site and make security a higher priority has shown that Facebook is aware of these issues and is willing to help preserve the privacy of it’s users. I think this was a great way to handle this blog, but maybe things should have been done a little sooner.

      • Christian Aniciete 06:56 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I hope that you are right, James. Facebook is without an excellent tool in communicating with family and friends across the globe but the issue of security and privacy is detrimental to their future success. Just the other day, I was watching the local news and there was a segment on personal information being disclosed even when users play some of the games featured on Facebook. The thought of this makes using Facebook a bit unsettling that I ended up re-checking my privacy settings. I hope this social networking company takes the time to listen to its users and proceed accordingly.

    • Namyot Pulkasem 09:37 on March 9, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      To me, this has been at top of conversation for so long about this Facebook issue. I think it’s the personal preference, and we all should be aware of any possible problems before uploading the information and some pictures. Also, before setting our contact, information, personal details, pictures, we must READ everything carefully before submitting those information to the social networking. The article makes me stop and think about Facebook;however’ i’m not going to delete or close my account. It depends on how we use these social networkings, and if we use it cleverly, I believe that it won’t affect us that much as the author mentioned on the article. We all have our own opinions and perspective, so it’s great to listen to others’ thoughts and adapt those ideas to improve our use of social networking sites. I also believe that the social networking companies will take those issues more seriously because the consumers have the rights to ask for the privacy.

    • Chi Long Lao 10:13 on March 9, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      I don’t really disagree with the article. I use facebook is because everyone are using it, not because I really want to use it. There have some reasons that i really agree with, such as some privacy problem. That’s why I don’t really put that many pictures on there, also it is a problem for us to delete a picture because I don’t really know it really deleted or not on the main server of facebook.
      However, I don’t think facebook need to worry about people are quiting as long as there still have a lot of people are using, but facebook need to be respond to its user clearly about their service and privacy.

    • Alexi Parry 01:12 on March 11, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      None of these reasons seem good enough for me to want to delete my Facebook account. Especially when the author says “delete Facebook because it sucks.” Sucks, really? I’m pretty sure any company could only dream to explode like this one did. By this point, this anger is really pure jealousy. They are trying to take people away from Facebook to their social media site. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. Sorry.

  • jackhardy 00:28 on January 28, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , blackra1n, hack, iPad, , MacBook   

    Why I will buy an Apple iPad in 2011 

    Apple iPad

    Today Apple unveiled the innovative tablet computer, the iPad. As usual, the carefully crafted Apple marketing  hype machine provided widely speculated and carefully leaked information about the iPad that preceded the actual introduction today. According to the company, the iPad is “Our most advanced technology in a magical and revolutionary device at an unbelievable price.” Wow, that’s a lot of adjectives in a single sentence. Without buying into all of the marketing hype, I do agree that it does have some very cool new features in a slim 9×7 package. Most importantly, I believe it is a revolutionary product, like the iPhone, and that it will eventually replace my MacBook Pro laptop computer. It’s a slick enhanced version of the iPhone, albeit with computer-esque features. Consider this: it allows easy e-mail access, beautiful video playback, easy photo review and sharing and the ability to purchase and read e-books with simplicity and comfort. No eye strain or small screens that require me to flip pages every 5-7 seconds, like the Kindle application on my iPhone. From an avid book reader perspective, screen size matters. There is an innovative feature that allows a virtual keyboard, identical to the iPhone software that will surely please and or alienate some who prefer a more tactile input. Make no mistake about it, this is the computer of the future! When I looked at the seemingly inadequate storage size, from 16GB to the superior solid state 64GB, I realized three things: 1) the second generation will surely have a larger storage capacity, just like the second and third generation of iPhones, 2) the utility of this product matches how people will use it (more on that in a minute and 3) I will purchase one next year because the price will drop, new features will be added and the inevitable bugs will be fixed. Now, back to point No. 2: When was the last time you spent time updating Excel spreadsheets or typing a novel in Microsoft Word or even storing gigabytes of video or pictures while in transit or waiting in line? Even when I take public transportation or business trips, everything that I usually need to do can be accomplished with this iPad. The proliferation of off-site storage options either through my home computer system or via online storage sites will eliminate all of these concerns in the future. The beauty is that this is simply a lightweight, network access device! (Did you notice the sneaky data plan option from AT&T.) That’s right, sync it to your .me or Google account and you have access to all of your documents and photos stored elsewhere. It’s lightweight, easy to read and for newspapers, which are all going digital, the addition of photos and video makes it a perfect fit. What you begin to realize is that this matches human behavior and alters the use of computer laptops into the evolving market of smart tablets. As an Apple iPhone and MacBook Pro laptop user, it’s currently a luxury with redundant technology. However, there is most certainly an iPad in my future. My only question is always the same and it has to do with AT&T. Will I still be able to use a software hack and connect my iPhone to my iPad to get broadband Internet access when I can’t find WiFi? Or will I care?

     
    • Anthony Kinen 23:26 on May 4, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      The iPad is truly revolutionary. I have spent some time playing with one and I am amazed. I as well see one in my future. I only have one small problem. There is an ongoing disagreement between Apple and Adobe. Basically Apple computers is telling Adobe to come into the future and produce something different than Flash. Adobe states that Flash is still revolutionary. Thus there is no flash support for the iPad at this time. I would not recommend getting the iPad with 3G capability. There are hacks available that allow an iPhone to become a mobile hot spot. There is also roomer that the 4G iPhone will have the mobile hot spot capability built in to native software. In the end I am not sure how much it really matters. I have not been anywhere where I could not find open WiFi.

      • Bailey Ortiz 22:35 on May 15, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        The iPad is amazing and I enjoy playing with them. They are more of a toy to me. I enjoy the screen and how skinny it is, but it does lag some. Also, getting on the internet sometimes at some restaurants and coffee shops has been an issue for me. They offer wifi and my laptop will sign on automatically but the ipad does not. I think eventually adobe and apple with become partners and work something out concering the flash. Overall though I would wait to purchase the iPad untilt the 2nd generation comes out. It will have even more exciting applications to it and all the gliches should be found by then.

    • Emma 07:49 on May 5, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I’ve seen it do its magic and am pretty amazed. However, it makes me wonder how much weight consumers will have to carry around between their ipods, iphones, laptops and now ipad. Does the ipad have the capacity to replace all of these? It would definitely be worth the buy then. Just wait to see how quickly the next piece of technology launches.

      • Bobby McClintock 05:14 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I think that the Ipad is a great piece of technology and will only get better after it is re-wired and all the bugs are worked out of it. When you say can this piece of technology replace all the iphone, ipod, and laptops I got a funny image of a person holding the much bigger ipad to their ear talking on the phone haha.

        • Emma Tudorache 09:06 on June 1, 2010 Permalink

          That’s exactly the image I was getting, but it still seemed better than having to carry all of this technology everywhere. Apple should put some of its investment toward creating really big, expandable backpacks!

    • Philip Peterson 18:38 on May 11, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      The thing with Apple not supporting adobe is really a good call on Apple’s part. At first this was my main reason behind not purchasing the ipad right away. I was actually kind mad that Apple hadn’t moved forward in my previous opinion and made the iPad flash user friendly. I though on this for a bit and came to the realization that if Apple open there platform to work with adobe they would lose soo many app sales. At the moment Apple controls there platform completely this is smart. Eventually I think that Apple will create a similar application as adobe that will take the place for flash.

    • Christian Aniciete 07:48 on May 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I, too, believe that the Apple iPad is a revolutionary product! Surely, I think the arrival of the iPad will duplicate the very same degree of impact the iPod had in the MP3 industry and the iPhone in the mobile industry. Before people know it, the iPad, as Professor Jack noted, will be the very future of computers. No longer will one be constricted by the limitations of their desktop or laptop computers. Now, with a device like the iPad, the possibilities – to e-mail, download pictures, read a book, watch a movie – are endless wherever and whenever one may be.

      I recently accepted a position with the Apple company and I couldn’t be more proud to be a part of such an innovative and world renowned company. Truly, Apple continues to change the world with its technological inventions. It’s so hard for one not to watch Apple’s every move closely to find out what they are going to release next….

      If anyone else is not convinced of how truly amazing the iPad is and why it is such a game changer, check out this promo video:

      I am looking forward to becoming a proud iPad owner soon.

    • Steve Knight 04:08 on May 25, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      My tech junkie cousin in LA bought one of the first ones and is already on the wait list for the new one. He is the same person that has had every iPhone version and every iPod version etc… My point is that the loyal fans of these products are just that, loyal. I like Professor Jacks approach, wait until the faster and larger memory ones come out. Behind closed doors down in Cupertino California somewhere, there are people working on the 2012 iPad, that will be the best iPad EVER, until a new version comes out that is!

    • Bobby McClintock 17:04 on May 25, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Me personally I have heard mixed reviews on the ipad. Some people are talking about how awesome it is and how it changes everything, but then on the other hand I’ve heard a lot of people say it’s just a big iphone or itouch. I’m not the most tech savvy person so I don’t personally know too much about the topic, but I’ve also heard of a few people having to return theirs because they have broken down. I do agree with the new versions coming out all of the bugs will be fixed and it will probably be a great new technology.

      • Royal Bryant 04:18 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        Honestly I agree wih the crowd wondering what the big deal is. I have had my iPhone for close to a year now and I am not that impressed with the iPad. I played with one in the student book store a few weeks back and I felt like I was using my phone. Other than having a big screen and keypad, the iPad is just a bigger version of what I can carry around in my pocket and make phone calls with. I dont think its practical.

      • scott bonallo 04:41 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        I completely agree. I am not really in touch with the whole Apple revolution even though I own a shuffle. I got this piece of equipment because it was easy to understand and it didn’t have a bunch of stuff I’d never use on it so it costs a lot less. I think the iPad is fascinating, but if I wanted something along those lines, I would probably just buy a laptop that I can modify as technology and hardware becomes obsolete as it always does. The thing about Apple is that you can’t really switch out parts for things like iPods or iPhones when they get behind the times so you have to constantly be buying new products to stay up on trends rather than modifying something you have already bought for a cheaper price. I also agree with Bobby’s comment about considering the iPad more once they work the bugs out just like the xbox, xbox 360, PS2 and PS3. Do I sense a technological trend?

    • Nejla Tajipour 22:02 on May 25, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I like Apple products, but I’ll never be a first buyer of a new product. There’s too much IPad hype going on right now. The product is undoubtedly remarkable, but as others pointed out, there is still much room for improvements. Apple stirs an irrational disconnect between new products, a consumer’s need, and adoption. The passion to buy is insane, and fueled by an irrational love of Apple products. I waited for the Iphone 3G to come out, and it felt like the right thing to do, months later the 3GS came out, and I was really upset for not waiting a bit longer. This is the thing about Apple; they give the early adopters a bad deal everytime.

    • kimberly lawson 22:44 on May 25, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      At first I didn’t really care for or want an iPad and now I’m starting to think about how much easier life would be with an iPad. As an avid user of both an Iphone and a Macbook Pro I definitely would not want to carry around multiple items for work, entertainment, and networking. I travel a lot and end up bringing my not so light Macbook Pro for the journey for work and entertainment, and I agree that the iPad could replace the need for many people carrying around laptops. Despite the new product just being called an oversized Iphone I still find myself starting to come around to the idea of being able to use an Ipad instead of my laptop for work reports and reading. I just really like being able to turn pages, and type on real keyboards.

    • Rasy Sar 04:12 on May 30, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      The iPad definitely looks cool but I wouldn’t want one. Financial factors aside, my friends and I were discussing how it’d be a bit troublesome to use it, such as trying to keep it secure in your lap and then keeping your back slouched all the time to look down at the screen, then there’s the constant use of your hands (wouldn’t they get tired?). But then again, I’m the type of guy who stays away from having the latest gadgets. Hey Professor Jack, did you hear about China’s cheaper imitation of the iPad? Yup, it’s about $200 cheaper and it has a unique name: the iPed.

      • Emma Tudorache 00:27 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        Wow! The iPed? That’s awesome. Knowing China’s technological capabilities, I’ll bet it’s just about as good as the original. It’s almost like choosing between Google’s imitation of the iPhone through the Android and the actual iPhone. There’s not a huge difference between the phones, outside of the iPhone’s snazzier look. I’m sure there will be many more look-a-likes to come.

        • Kimberly Lawson 18:49 on June 1, 2010 Permalink

          That’s definitely interesting, I was reading something about the Iped today. There seems to be a lot of Apple users that have become really loyal to the brand ever since the Ipod came out. The easy to use controls and familiarity that products have are known by an Apple customer already. I love how in the Ipad commercial it’s saying “you already know how to use it.”
          It’s also interesting how they have someone riding a bike and holding it, which always freaks me out when I see the ad because one of my main concerns with the Ipad would be dropping it because of it’s large thin shape.

    • Marlon Harris 20:49 on May 31, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      When I first heard of the buzz for the new Ipad it sounded exciting. A new, big computer-like pad that’s a cross between the Iphone and a Macbook. Then I heard about some of the disadvantages like not being able to operate more than one application at a time and the small hard drive and I thought yeah I can wait longer for the next version. As noted earlier, Apple tends to come out with products that don’t necessarily have all the top features like big hard drives and cameras with a flash on the Iphone for example. Therefore, it’s usually best to wait to get the better or more advanced product in a year or so.

    • Yousef 21:24 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I bought an IPad and it took me 3 days to turn it back to the store. I’m an Apple fam I got all of their stuff from Ipod Imac and used to have an IPhone. however, when I bought the IPad I was hoping to see something new with it something that makes it amazing, but when I started using it felt to me as the IPod touch screen with a larger screen.

    • Marlon Harris 22:41 on June 1, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      The Ipad may not seem like that big of a deal to some people, but others have made a big deal of it by lining up and purchasing it. The sheer portable size of it makes it look so interesting, but hearing about the limited features still doesn’t make the purchase justifiable to me. I’m seriously hoping that by some time in 2011 Apple will add some more appeasing features to make me want to make a purchase. Of course, part of that will also depend on waiting for them to get all the bugs and problems taking care of by then as many tech products require those adjustments.

    • Meg Van Winkle 03:02 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I’ve heard a lot about the iPad…first of all, I don’t prefer Apple or Mac or anything. At all. I won’t even go near the store in the Pioneer Place mall. So why would I buy the product? I really wouldn’t. I don’t care how nifty it is….I don’t even have an mp3 player, let alone an iPod, mac, or anything of the sort! Still, kudos to Apple for creating such a great product.

    • Christian Aniciete 04:13 on June 2, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I’d love to have an iPad sometime in the future but as some people already said, I definitely would not be a first buyer of a new product. Though I consider myself to be an Apple enthusiast who has most of its products (a MacBook, an iPhone, an iTouch, etc), I always hesitate when it comes to a new product because of certain bugs and drawbacks a new product is typically associated with. Having played with an iPad multiple times though, some of the features that it has that stand out to me are its incredible portability, access to the Internet anywhere you go, ability to read libraries and libraries of books, and share photos and videos anywhere and anytime. I think it would be particularly interesting to see how the iPad could revolutionize sectors like the medical field. I could imagine the iPad’s potential in replacing hard copies of X-Rays or doctors being able to demonstrate certain images (ie. images of specific bodily disorders, etc) with patients thanks to the device’s amazing graphics.

    • Chi Long Lao 23:28 on January 25, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      As a Apple user, I think all the product lines of Apple will be a good products for them but I am not a Apple user. Here I didn’t mean that Apple’s product is not a good product, i think Apple’s products are good too. But I do mean that there do have a lot of other good products around and Apple is not the only company has the best computer, mp3, etc.(But I do think that Apple is the best computing and mp3 company in US because the products that send from outside of US had changed something before they release in US) In fact, I don’t really know what is the point to buy a Ipad, my sony laptop is almost as light as Ipad, maybe the only thing that I can’t do is play the apps from Apple Inc., but my Samsung Galaxy S can play most of them. Therefore, As a customer who not addict to Apple’s product, as not a follower of Apple Inc, I think Ipad is not needed, if you have a Imac, Iphone, why you need to spend a money again to buy Ipad? Maybe sometime in the futuer, Apple will release Iread for reading online books or something like that.

    • Namyot Pulkasem 08:48 on March 5, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      I’m planning to buy a New Macbook Pro because I’m very impressed with my Ipod(3rd Gen) Touch that I’ve owned for 2 years, and I believe that Macbook Pro will surely make me satisfied. In face, iPad2 just recently released, and it’s called “Post-PC”. As we mostly know that Apple just slightly improves their products for the upgrading not a big improvement, but it’s still truly revolutionary. Personally, iPad2 seems to be very interesting to me, and it has great features and useful built-in apps. Also, I think iPad2 will become more popular because almost every US household and people in other countries use wireless to connect the Internet, and iPad will be very suitable for them. Apple also offers the 3G+ WiFi from AT&T and Verizon for getting broadband Internet access. So iPad can be used anywhere, anytime now. I think iPad is great for any purposes, such entertainment, business, and communication. It’s faster, lighter, and thinner. Other brands will be definitely releasing the better gadgets very soon, and they might able to overcome Apple in terms of generic quality. But they won’t be able to compete with Apple in the reality because Apple “knows” what their customers really want in everyday life, and Apple combines the technology and everyday life in order to develop their products and to reach the customers’ desire, so that’s why they’re superior than other brands.

    • Chi Long Lao 08:33 on March 9, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      I am not an Apple user, so I will not going to buy any apple products. But this doesn’t mean I hate Apple or something. I don’t like to use Apple’s product is because I feel like I am controling by Apple as a consumer if I start to use its products. For example, Ipad doesn’t have front and back camera, now Ipad 2 have one, should I give up Ipad 1 and buy Ipad 2? The problem is not only about giving up the Ipad 1 or not, but also why Ipad 1 doesn have back and front camera? Ipad 1 release in 2010, which is the period that almost every computer, cell phone products have camera, such as the similar product Galaxy Tap also has front and back camera. Now Apple release Ipad 2 and said because it has front and back camera, so it is a new product? Do these factor really make apple Ipad 2 a very new products? How much does it cost for apple to make it lighter, faster and install a front and back camera on Ipad 2? and how much does it cost for us to buy a new Ipad? Doesn’t matter Apple will give you some benefit or not, as a Apple user, 100% will want to buy Ipad 2 just becasue it has front and back camera, which is a old style technology but called new product. But Apple’s consumers have no choice to choose though because if you don’t follow Apple’s step, you can’t do anything. This is only my opinion, please forgive me if an Apple user read my comment.

    • Emily Maxwell 02:03 on March 16, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      I fully support an iLife. I work at Nordstrom and they are currently adding iPads to each department for Sales Associates. It allows sales people to quickly suggest other items in the store without taking the time to retrieve the item from the rack.

      I have not had a chance to visit the Apple Store to have a look at the new iPad2 but I’m very excited to see what the new features look like. I wish they did not cost so much!

    • Noah Nwokoma 20:05 on February 6, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Not being an apple user myself, I don’t really understand why customers are willing to run out and buy every iteration of a product that Apple releases. It seems like they come out with a new Iphone every year, yet they still don’t have a 4G phone (maybe the iphone 7 or 8 will:). With regard to the Ipad, competitors have products that are comparable to or better than than the Ipad but people will not buy them because they doesn’t have an apple logo on them. While I think that Ipad’s are pretty cool, I am not willing to pay a price premium for Apple’s good marketing and branding tactics. Every review I have seen lately regarding Apple’s products customers give a 5/5 for everything except price. The question is, why do people still buy every single Apple product when they know how overpriced they are?

      • jackhardy 00:39 on February 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Aha! Your first sentence says it all: “Not being an Apple user myself…” I believe that once you try their products you will be impressed with their ease of use.

    • Dahir Moalim 11:52 on February 7, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I totally agree. I own the iPad when it first hit the market, and I think the iPad product impact a lot people image towards Apple products. Many people have negative responds on how iPad is exactly the same as the iPhone, but only bigger. I truly would admit that I am an Apple junkie, and a loyal consumer to any new Apple product in the market. But with that being said, I believe the iPad 2 was completely a bad idea for Apple Company to release, because if you think about the device can possibly do same stuff as the iPhone cellphone. Let’s be realistic now, Apple products has the highest device in the U.S. market and has high demand outside of America. Apple still continues to change the world perception towards how amazing a small device can possibly do.

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.